LiteAce VAN Gasoline MT vs Toyota Hiace 2023 3.5L GL STD Roof Panel Van (3-Seater) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
4
4
/
160
Dimensions
2
3 Seater
1230
/
14
✓
4045
5.265
1665
1.950
1930
1.990
2650
3.210
2000
/
4.9m
/
2075 - 1495 - 1305
/
3.4m³
/
770
/
/
/
Fuel Economy
14.1 Km/L
9.9
43
65
Comfort
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
Driver Seat
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
Driver & Front Passenger
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
7
/
✓
✓
✓
/
2
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
5-Speed Manual Transmission
Manual
Chassis & Steering
Rear Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Coil Spring
/
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
✓
Drum
/
165R14C
/
165R14C
/
Key Spec
1.5 L - 1.5 L
2.5 L - 3.5 L
96 BHP - 96 BHP
88 BHP - 277
4-Speed Automatic & 4-Speed Automatic Transmission & 5-Speed Manual Transmission & Manual
6-Speed Automatic & 6-Speed Automatic Transmission & 6-Speed Manual & 6-Speed Manual Transmission & Automatic & Manual
Petrol & Gasoline
Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
2 Seater - 2 Seater
3 - 13 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5
3.5 L
Gasoline
Petrol
96.5
277 BHP
134
360
Technologies
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
LiteAce VAN Gasoline MT
- Parking sensor rear
- Number of Airbags
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
Toyota Hiace 2023 3.5L GL STD Roof Panel Van (3-Seater)
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Welcome Light
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Spacious and versatile space
- High durability and reliability
- Excellent stability and driving quality
Negative
- Simple interior design and limited passenger comfort
- Fuel economy is lower than expected
- Sound insulation and suspension system need to be improved
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose LiteAce VAN Gasoline MT if you care more about price; choose Toyota Hiace 2023 3.5L GL STD Roof Panel Van (3-Seater) if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, LiteAce VAN Gasoline MT has a fuel consumption of 7.09, while Toyota Hiace 2023 3.5L GL STD Roof Panel Van (3-Seater) has a fuel consumption of 10.1. Therefore, LiteAce VAN Gasoline MT is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, LiteAce VAN Gasoline MT has a wheelbase of 2650, while Toyota Hiace 2023 3.5L GL STD Roof Panel Van (3-Seater) has a wheelbase of 3.210. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, LiteAce VAN Gasoline MT, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. LiteAce VAN Gasoline MT uses Rear Drive, while Toyota Hiace 2023 3.5L GL STD Roof Panel Van (3-Seater) uses Rear Wheel Drive.