LM 350h vs Carnival 3.5L EX AT 12 Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
3.5 Liter
Dimensions
7
8
5,130
5155
1,890
1995
1,940
1740
3,000
/
/
18
Fuel Economy
18 Km/L
/
/
72
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
/
Front Row Seats
/
4.2
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
7
/
✓
/
/
/
✓
Infotainment
/
12
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
Transmission
e-CVT
8 Speed AT
/
8 Speed AT
Chassis & Steering
/
MOTOR DRIVEN POWER STEERING
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
/
✓
/
235/60 R18
/
235/60 R18
Key Spec
2.5 L
3.3 L - 3.5 L
250
245 - 290
e-CVT
8 Speed AT & 8 Speed AT w/E-SHIFT (SWB) & Automatic & Automatic
Hybrid
Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
TBD
TBD
7
7 - 8
Engine
2.5 L
3.5
Hybrid
Gasoline
250
268 BHP
239
/
/
3.5 Liters, 3,470 cc, 6 Cylinders, 24 VALVE, DOHC
/
6
/
268 hp / 6,400 rpm
/
33.8 Kg.m (331.5 Nm) /5,000 rpm
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comfort - Eco - Sports - Smart
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
LM 350h
Carnival 3.5L EX AT 12
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Number of Airbags
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickLM 350h
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose LM 350h if you care more about price; choose Carnival 3.5L EX AT 12 if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, LM 350h has a fuel consumption of 5.56, while Carnival 3.5L EX AT 12 has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, LM 350h has a wheelbase of 3,000, while Carnival 3.5L EX AT 12 has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. LM 350h uses No data, while Carnival 3.5L EX AT 12 uses No data.