CarteaCompare CarsLM 350h vs D9 DM-i

LM 350h vs D9 DM-i Comparison

Car Information

/

155 km

/

1.01 L/100km

Dimensions

7

7

5,130

5,250

1,890

1,960

1,940

1,920

3,000

3,110

Fuel Economy

18 Km/L

16.1 km/L

Transmission

e-CVT

E-CVT

Key Spec

2.5 L

1.5 L - 1.5 L

250

296 - 369

e-CVT

E-CVT & Single-speed Fixed Gear

Hybrid

Electric & Hybrid

TBD

TBD

7

7

Engine

2.5 L

1.5 L

Hybrid

Hybrid

250

296

239

681

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • LM 350h

    • D9 DM-i

      Review Comparison

      Positive

      • No data found

      Negative

      • No data found

      Positive

      • No data found

      Negative

      • No data found

      Related comparisons

      Editor's PickLM 350h

      Expert / Editor Recommendation

      Choose LM 350h if you care more about price; choose D9 DM-i if you care more about interior space.

      Popular Car Comparisons

      Lexus | LM 350h

      VS

      Li Auto | Mega 2024 Ultra

      Lexus | LM 350h

      VS

      JAC | JAC J6 2016 1.8

      Lexus | LM 350h

      VS

      JAC | JAC J6 2015 1.8

      Lexus | LM 350h

      VS

      Toyota | Toyota Sienna L

      Lexus | LM 350h

      VS

      Toyota | Toyota Sienna SE

      Q&A

      • According to fuel consumption data, LM 350h has a fuel consumption of 5.56, while D9 DM-i has a fuel consumption of 6.21. Therefore, LM 350h is more fuel-efficient.
      • In terms of interior space, LM 350h has a wheelbase of 3,000, while D9 DM-i has a wheelbase of 3,110. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, D9 DM-i, offers more room.
      • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. LM 350h uses No data, while D9 DM-i uses No data.