LM 350h vs Suzuki APV 2017 1.6L Commercial Van (8-Seater) Comparison
Car Information
MPV
/
Engine / Motor
/
140
/
4
Dimensions
7
8 Seater
5,130
4230
1,890
1655
1,940
1880
3,000
2625
Fuel Economy
18 Km/L
12.0
/
46
Comfort
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
e-CVT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
/
Rear Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
Engine
2.5 L
1.6 L
Hybrid
Gasoline
250
91 BHP
239
127
Key Spec
/
1.6 L
/
91 BHP
/
Automatic & Manual
/
Gasoline
/
TBD
/
2 Seater - 8 Seater
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Technologies
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
LM 350h
Suzuki APV 2017 1.6L Commercial Van (8-Seater)
- Rear Defogger
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickSuzuki APV 2017 1.6L Commercial Van (8-Seater)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose LM 350h if you care more about fuel economy; choose Suzuki APV 2017 1.6L Commercial Van (8-Seater) if you care more about overall equipment.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, LM 350h has a fuel consumption of 5.56, while Suzuki APV 2017 1.6L Commercial Van (8-Seater) has a fuel consumption of 8.33. Therefore, LM 350h is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, LM 350h has a wheelbase of 3,000, while Suzuki APV 2017 1.6L Commercial Van (8-Seater) has a wheelbase of 2625. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, LM 350h, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. LM 350h uses No data, while Suzuki APV 2017 1.6L Commercial Van (8-Seater) uses Rear Wheel Drive.