EX5 Pro vs 300 Challenger 2.0T Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
200 km/h
/
4
/
1998 cc
/
Chinese
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
18
/
4615
4760 mm
1901
1930 mm
1670
1927 mm
2750
2750 mm
/
5 Doors
/
400 L
/
224 m
Fuel Economy
/
10 Km/L
/
75 L
/
10 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Smart Key
Keyless Entry
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
Driver Seat
/
10.2
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
PVC Leather
Leather
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
6
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
15.4
12.3
6
9
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
Transmission
AT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
/
Four Wheel Drive
Key Spec
TBD
/
218
223 BHP - 342 BHP
AT
Automatic
Electric
Gasoline & Hybrid
TBD
/
5
5 Seater
/
2.0 L
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
Electric
Gasoline
218
224 BHP
/
In-Line
/
2.0 L
/
Single Turbo
/
4
/
387 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
EX5 Pro
- 360 Degree Camera
- Keyless Entry
- Keyless Start
- Remote key types
- Number of Airbags
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
300 Challenger 2.0T
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickEX5 Pro
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose EX5 Pro if you care more about price; choose 300 Challenger 2.0T if you care more about power.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, EX5 Pro has a fuel consumption of No data, while 300 Challenger 2.0T has a fuel consumption of 10. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, EX5 Pro has a wheelbase of 2750, while 300 Challenger 2.0T has a wheelbase of 2750 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. EX5 Pro uses No data, while 300 Challenger 2.0T uses Four Wheel Drive.