EX5 Pro vs HS 2.0T Comfort Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
210 km/h
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
18
/
4615
4574 mm
1901
1876 mm
1670
1685 mm
2750
2720 mm
/
463 L
Fuel Economy
/
12.2 Km/L
/
55 L
/
12.2 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Key
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
Driver Seat
/
10.2
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
PVC Leather
/
✓
/
Safety
6
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
15.4
/
6
/
Transmission
AT
/
Chassis & Steering
/
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
TBD
/
218
127 - 231
AT
9AT & Automatic & DCT
Electric
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
/
5
5 Seater
/
2.0 L - 2.0 L
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
Electric
Gasoline
218
231 BHP
/
2.0 L
/
360 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
EX5 Pro
- 360 Degree Camera
- Keyless Entry
- Keyless Start
- Remote key types
- Number of Airbags
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
HS 2.0T Comfort
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickHS 2.0T Comfort
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose EX5 Pro if you care more about interior space; choose HS 2.0T Comfort if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, EX5 Pro has a fuel consumption of No data, while HS 2.0T Comfort has a fuel consumption of 8.2. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, EX5 Pro has a wheelbase of 2750, while HS 2.0T Comfort has a wheelbase of 2720 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EX5 Pro, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. EX5 Pro uses No data, while HS 2.0T Comfort uses Front Wheel Drive.