LX Comfort vs CX3 2.0L GT (FWD) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
190 km/h
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
18"
/
4533
4275 mm
1848
1765 mm
1700
1535 mm
2670
2570 mm
/
240 L
Fuel Economy
/
15.4 Km/L
/
48 L
/
15.4 Km/L
Comfort
Reversing Camera
/
4 way
/
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
Driver Seat
/
12.3 inches
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
EBD
/
active braking-pedestrian
/
✓
/
Infotainment
12.3 inches
/
✓
/
✓
/
6
/
Transmission
CVT
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.5 L - 1.6 L
2.0 L - 2.0 L
144 HP - 197 BHP
145 BHP - 148 BHP
7DCT & Automatic & CVT
6 Speed SkyActiv with Sports Mode & Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5 - 5
Exterior
كهربائي
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Engine
1.5T
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
144 HP
148 BHP
137kw at 5501 rpm
/
187 Nm
192 Nm
Technologies
Reversing & front radar
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
LX Comfort
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Rear Cross Traffic Alert
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Limiter
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
CX3 2.0L GT (FWD)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickCX3 2.0L GT (FWD)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose LX Comfort if you care more about interior space; choose CX3 2.0L GT (FWD) if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, LX Comfort has a fuel consumption of No data, while CX3 2.0L GT (FWD) has a fuel consumption of 6.49. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, LX Comfort has a wheelbase of 2670, while CX3 2.0L GT (FWD) has a wheelbase of 2570 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, LX Comfort, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. LX Comfort uses Front Drive, while CX3 2.0L GT (FWD) uses All Wheel Drive.