Lynk & Co 01 2024 Lynk & Co 01 2024 2.0T Hyper vs Changan CS35 2017 1.6L Comfortable Comparison
Engine / Motor
210
180
4
4
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
✓
/
4.549
4160
1.860
1810
1.689
1670
2.734
2560
509
348
Fuel Economy
14.9
14.7
54
52
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
✓
/
✓
/
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
Key Spec
2.0 L
1.6 L
216 BHP
123 BHP
Automatic
Automatic
Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
1.6 L
Petrol
Gasoline
216 BHP
123 BHP
325
160
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Lynk & Co 01 2024 Lynk & Co 01 2024 2.0T Hyper
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- 360 Degree Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Door Edge Protector
- Active Understeer Control (AUC)
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Auto Door Lock
- Spare Wheel
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
Changan CS35 2017 1.6L Comfortable
- Rear Defogger
- Keyless Entry
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickChangan CS35 2017 1.6L Comfortable
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Lynk & Co 01 2024 Lynk & Co 01 2024 2.0T Hyper if you care more about fuel economy; choose Changan CS35 2017 1.6L Comfortable if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Lynk & Co 01 2024 Lynk & Co 01 2024 2.0T Hyper has a fuel consumption of 6.71, while Changan CS35 2017 1.6L Comfortable has a fuel consumption of 6.8. Therefore, Lynk & Co 01 2024 Lynk & Co 01 2024 2.0T Hyper is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Lynk & Co 01 2024 Lynk & Co 01 2024 2.0T Hyper has a wheelbase of 2.734, while Changan CS35 2017 1.6L Comfortable has a wheelbase of 2560. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Changan CS35 2017 1.6L Comfortable, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Lynk & Co 01 2024 Lynk & Co 01 2024 2.0T Hyper uses Front Wheel Drive, while Changan CS35 2017 1.6L Comfortable uses Front Wheel Drive.