Lynk&Co 01 Hyper vs GX3 PRO GK Comparison

Car Information

4549 * 1860 * 1689

/

Engine / Motor

210

/

4

/

Dimensions

5

5

1710

/

19"

/

4549

4005

1860

1575

1689

1760

2734

2480

213

/

/

250

Fuel Economy

13.5

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

Driver Seat

/

12.7"

/

/

/

12.3"

/

/

/

/

/

Dual

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Front

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Front Row

/

/

/

2

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

8

2

/

3.5

Transmission

Automatic

CVT

Chassis & Steering

Front Wheel Drive

Front Drive

MacphersonMacphersan Independent with stabilizer bar

/

Multi-link Independent with stabilizer bar

/

EPAS

/

Wheels/brakes

/

235/50 R19

205/60 R16

235/50 R19

205/60 R16

Key Spec

2.0 L

1.5

216 BHP - 217 BHP

100 BHP - 102

Automatic

CVT

Gasoline

Gasoline

TBD

TBD

5

5

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.0 L

1.5

Gasoline

Gasoline

217 BHP

100 BHP

5000

/

325

/

4500

/

Technologies

Rear

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Eco / Normal / Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Lynk&Co 01 Hyper

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Keyless Entry
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Emergency Lane Keeping (ELK)
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Intelligent Emergency Call
    • Rollover stability control
    • Collision Detection
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Spare Wheel
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Active braking
    • Lane Departure Warning
    • Seat belt reminder
  • GX3 PRO GK

    • Electronic Engine Immobilizer
    • Push Button Start
    • Collision Safety Door Latch Open System
    • Collision Safety Cut-Out
    • Number of Airbags
    • Crash Auto Door Unlock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
    • Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Child Lock
    • Seat belt reminder

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickGX3 PRO GK

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Lynk&Co 01 Hyper if you care more about interior space; choose GX3 PRO GK if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Lynk & Co | Lynk&Co 01 Hyper

VS

Haval | H7 Top 2026

Lynk & Co | Lynk&Co 01 Hyper

VS

Honda | CRV EX Full Option (AWD)

Lynk & Co | Lynk&Co 01 Hyper

VS

Honda | ZRV LX 1.5L

Lynk & Co | Lynk&Co 01 Hyper

VS

BYD | Song Plus Design

Lynk & Co | Lynk&Co 01 Hyper

VS

Chery | Tiggo 9 Comfort

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Lynk&Co 01 Hyper has a fuel consumption of 7.41, while GX3 PRO GK has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Lynk&Co 01 Hyper has a wheelbase of 2734, while GX3 PRO GK has a wheelbase of 2480. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Lynk&Co 01 Hyper, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Lynk&Co 01 Hyper uses Front Wheel Drive, while GX3 PRO GK uses Front Drive.