Lynk&Co 01 Hyper vs Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
210
/
4
4
/
GCC
Dimensions
5
7 Seater
1710
/
19"
/
4549
4950 mm
1860
1930 mm
1689
1730 mm
2734
2850 mm
213
/
/
5 Doors
Fuel Economy
13.5
20 Km/L
/
65 L
/
20 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Interior
Driver Seat
/
12.7"
/
✓
/
✓
/
12.3"
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Dual
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
8
/
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
MacphersonMacphersan Independent with stabilizer bar
/
Multi-link Independent with stabilizer bar
/
EPAS
/
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
235/50 R19
/
235/50 R19
/
Key Spec
2.0 L
2.5 L - 2.5 L
216 BHP - 217 BHP
240 BHP - 240 BHP
Automatic
Automatic & CVT & eCVT & Electronically controlled Continuously Variable Transmission (ECVT)
Gasoline
Hybrid & Hybrid
TBD
TBD
5
7 Seater - 7 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
2.5 L
Gasoline
Hybrid
217 BHP
240 BHP
5000
/
325
237 Nm
4500
/
/
In-Line
/
None
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Eco / Normal / Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Lynk&Co 01 Hyper
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree Camera
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Steering Adjustment
- Emergency Lane Keeping (ELK）
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Intelligent Emergency Call
- Rollover stability control
- Collision Detection
- Auto Door Lock
- Spare Wheel
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
- Seat belt reminder
Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD)
- Rear Camera
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Lynk&Co 01 Hyper if you care more about price; choose Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Lynk&Co 01 Hyper has a fuel consumption of 7.41, while Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) has a fuel consumption of 5. Therefore, Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Lynk&Co 01 Hyper has a wheelbase of 2734, while Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) has a wheelbase of 2850 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Lynk&Co 01 Hyper uses Front Wheel Drive, while Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive.