CarteaCompare CarsLynk&Co 01 Hyper vs S7 Pro

Lynk&Co 01 Hyper vs S7 Pro Comparison

Car Information

4549 * 1860 * 1689

/

Engine / Motor

210

/

4

/

Dimensions

5

5

1710

/

19"

/

4549

4900

1860

1950

1689

1780

2734

2880

213

/

Fuel Economy

13.5

16

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

Driver Seat

/

12.7"

/

/

/

12.3"

/

/

/

/

/

Dual

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

8

/

Transmission

Automatic

DHT

Chassis & Steering

Front Wheel Drive

/

MacphersonMacphersan Independent with stabilizer bar

/

Multi-link Independent with stabilizer bar

/

EPAS

/

Wheels/brakes

/

235/50 R19

/

235/50 R19

/

Key Spec

2.0 L

1.5

216 BHP - 217 BHP

160 BHP

Automatic

DHT

Gasoline

Hybrid

TBD

TBD

5

5

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.0 L

1.5

Gasoline

Hybrid

217 BHP

160 BHP

5000

/

325

/

4500

/

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Eco / Normal / Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Lynk&Co 01 Hyper

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Keyless Entry
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Emergency Lane Keeping (ELK)
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Intelligent Emergency Call
    • Rollover stability control
    • Collision Detection
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Spare Wheel
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Active braking
    • Lane Departure Warning
    • Seat belt reminder
  • S7 Pro

    Review Comparison

    Positive

    • No data found

    Negative

    • No data found

    Positive

    • No data found

    Negative

    • No data found

    Related comparisons

    Editor's PickS7 Pro

    Expert / Editor Recommendation

    Choose Lynk&Co 01 Hyper if you care more about power; choose S7 Pro if you care more about price.

    Popular Car Comparisons

    Lynk & Co | Lynk&Co 01 Hyper

    VS

    Haval | H7 Top 2026

    Lynk & Co | Lynk&Co 01 Hyper

    VS

    Honda | CRV EX Full Option (AWD)

    Lynk & Co | Lynk&Co 01 Hyper

    VS

    Honda | ZRV LX 1.5L

    Lynk & Co | Lynk&Co 01 Hyper

    VS

    BYD | Song Plus Design

    Lynk & Co | Lynk&Co 01 Hyper

    VS

    Chery | Tiggo 9 Comfort

    Q&A

    • According to fuel consumption data, Lynk&Co 01 Hyper has a fuel consumption of 7.41, while S7 Pro has a fuel consumption of 6.25. Therefore, S7 Pro is more fuel-efficient.
    • In terms of interior space, Lynk&Co 01 Hyper has a wheelbase of 2734, while S7 Pro has a wheelbase of 2880. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, S7 Pro, offers more room.
    • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Lynk&Co 01 Hyper uses Front Wheel Drive, while S7 Pro uses No data.