Lynk&Co 03+ vs Altima 2.5 S Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

250

220 km/h

Dimensions

5

5 Seater

1645

/

19"

/

4697

4869 mm

1843

1850 mm

1448

1440 mm

2730

2825 mm

/

517 L

Fuel Economy

14.1

15.9 Km/L

/

61.3 L

/

15.9 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

Front Row Seats

/

12.8"

/

/

/

Driver Seat

/

/

12.3"

/

Front Row Seats

/

Alcantara + Genuine Leather

/

/

Dual

/

/

/

/

/

/

Sport

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

10

/

Transmission

/

8AT

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

Four-Wheel Drive

Front Wheel Drive

4WD

/

MacPherson Strut with Stabilizer Bar

/

Multi-link with Stabilizer Bar

/

EPAS

/

Wheels/brakes

245/35 R19

/

245/35 R19

/

Key Spec

2.0 L - 2.0 L

2.0 L - 3.5 L

265 - 265

179 BHP - 270 BHP

8AT & Automatic

Automatic & CVT & CVTS & Manual

Gasoline

Petrol & Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

5

5 Seater - 5 Seater

Exterior

كهربائي

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.0

2.5 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

265

188 BHP

5500

/

380

244 Nm

4000

/

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

ECO/Sports/Comfort/Individual

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Lynk&Co 03+

    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Keyless Entry
    • Welcome Light
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Emergency Lane Keeping (ELK)
    • Rear Cross Traffic Alert
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Lane Following Assist
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Lane Departure Warning
    • Lane Keeping Assist
  • Altima 2.5 S

    • ABS

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • Excellent driving comfort
  • Economical fuel efficiency
  • Advanced security systems

Negative

  • Average motive power performance
  • Improvement of internal materials
  • Noise insulation needs to be developed

Related comparisons

Editor's PickAltima 2.5 S

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Lynk&Co 03+ if you care more about power; choose Altima 2.5 S if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Lynk & Co | Lynk&Co 03+

VS

Honda | Accord HEV Sport 2.0L

Lynk & Co | Lynk&Co 03+

VS

Honda | Accord HEV Sport 2.0L 2025

Lynk & Co | Lynk&Co 03+

VS

Dodge | Dodge Charger 2022 5.7L R/T

Lynk & Co | Lynk&Co 03+

VS

Dodge | Dodge Charger 2021 5.7L R/T

Lynk & Co | Lynk&Co 03+

VS

Chrysler | Chrysler 300 2021 3.6L V6

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Lynk&Co 03+ has a fuel consumption of 7.09, while Altima 2.5 S has a fuel consumption of 6.29. Therefore, Altima 2.5 S is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Lynk&Co 03+ has a wheelbase of 2730, while Altima 2.5 S has a wheelbase of 2825 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Altima 2.5 S, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Lynk&Co 03+ uses Four-Wheel Drive, while Altima 2.5 S uses Front Wheel Drive.