Lynk&Co 03+ vs Stinger 2.0T (255 PS) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
250
240 km/h
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
1645
/
19"
/
4697
4830 mm
1843
1870 mm
1448
1400 mm
2730
2905 mm
/
406 L
Fuel Economy
14.1
12.7 Km/L
/
60 L
/
12.7 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
12.8"
/
✓
/
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
12.3"
/
Front Row Seats
/
Alcantara + Genuine Leather
/
✓
/
Dual
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Sport
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
10
/
Transmission
✓
/
8AT
/
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
4WD
/
MacPherson Strut with Stabilizer Bar
/
Multi-link with Stabilizer Bar
/
EPAS
/
Wheels/brakes
245/35 R19
/
245/35 R19
/
Key Spec
2.0 L - 2.0 L
2.0 L - 3.3 L
265 - 265
251 BHP - 365 BHP
8AT & Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5
5 Seater
Exterior
كهربائي
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
2.0
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
265
251 BHP
5500
/
380
353 Nm
4000
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
ECO/Sports/Comfort/Individual
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Lynk&Co 03+
- 360 Degree Camera
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Emergency Lane Keeping (ELK）
- Rear Cross Traffic Alert
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Lane Following Assist
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
Stinger 2.0T (255 PS)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Lynk&Co 03+ if you care more about fuel economy; choose Stinger 2.0T (255 PS) if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Lynk&Co 03+ has a fuel consumption of 7.09, while Stinger 2.0T (255 PS) has a fuel consumption of 7.87. Therefore, Lynk&Co 03+ is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Lynk&Co 03+ has a wheelbase of 2730, while Stinger 2.0T (255 PS) has a wheelbase of 2905 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Stinger 2.0T (255 PS), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Lynk&Co 03+ uses Four-Wheel Drive, while Stinger 2.0T (255 PS) uses Rear Wheel Drive.