Lynk&Co 03 Plus vs Z10 RWD Pro Comparison
Car Information
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
1560
/
18"
/
4684
/
1843
/
1460
/
2730
/
Fuel Economy
17
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
12.8"
/
✓
/
✓
/
12.3"
/
Leather
/
✓
/
Dual
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
8
/
Transmission
✓
/
7DCT
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
/
/
/
Macpherson
/
Multi Link
/
EPAS
/
Wheels/brakes
225/45 R18
/
225/45 R18
/
Key Spec
2.0 L - 2.0 L
/
218 - 218
272 BHP
7DCT
TBD
Gasoline
Electric
TBD
/
5
5 Seater
/
TBD
/
TBD
Exterior
كهربائي
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
2.0
/
Gasoline
Electric
218
272 BHP
5000
/
325
/
4500
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
ECO/Sports/Comfort/Individual
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Lynk&Co 03 Plus
- 360 Degree Camera
- Keyless Entry
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Keyless Start
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
Z10 RWD Pro
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickZ10 RWD Pro
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Lynk&Co 03 Plus if you care more about overall equipment; choose Z10 RWD Pro if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Lynk&Co 03 Plus has a fuel consumption of 5.88, while Z10 RWD Pro has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Lynk&Co 03 Plus has a wheelbase of 2730, while Z10 RWD Pro has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Lynk&Co 03 Plus uses Front Drive, while Z10 RWD Pro uses No data.