Lynk&Co 06 Core Plus vs iCAUR V27 Classic Comparison

Car Information

6.40

1.8

/

8.5

/

Electric

/

95

/

300

Engine / Motor

195

/

1499

/

Dimensions

5

5

1440

/

18"

19"

4340

5045

1820

1976

1625

1894

2640

2900

1025

/

5.5

/

172

/

Fuel Economy

15.6

55

51

/

Comfort

/

/

/

Interior

Driver Seat

Front Row Seats

12.3"

15.4"

/

10.25"

8.88"

Leather

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Sport

/

/

/

/

/

Dual

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

6

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

6

/

/

Battery/Charging

/

0.5

Transmission

/

7DCT

AT

Chassis & Steering

Front Drive

Rear Drive

Macphersan Independent with stabilizer bar

MacPherson

Multi-link Independent with stabilizer bar

Multi Link

EPAS

/

Wheels/brakes

Ventilated

/

Solid

/

215/55 R18

255/55 R19

215/55 R18

255/55 R19

Key Spec

1.5 L - 1.5 L

/

181 BHP - 181 BHP

248 - 450

7DCT

AT

Gasoline

Electric

TBD

/

5 - 5

5

/

TBD

/

TBD

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

1.5

1.5

Gasoline

Electric

181 HP

248

5500

/

290

300

3500

/

Technologies

/

/

/

/

Economic/Sport/Comfort/Intelligent

Snow, Sand, Etc

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Motor

/

185

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Lynk&Co 06 Core Plus

    • Parking sensor rear
    • Keyless Start
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Intelligent Emergency Call
    • Rollover stability control
    • Seatbelt pretensioner
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Seat belt reminder
  • iCAUR V27 Classic

    • Rear Cross Traffic Alert
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Number of Airbags
    • Driving Recorder
    • Rollover stability control
    • Collision Detection
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
    • Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickLynk&Co 06 Core Plus

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Lynk&Co 06 Core Plus if you care more about price; choose iCAUR V27 Classic if you care more about fuel economy.

Popular Car Comparisons

Lynk & Co | Lynk&Co 06 Core Plus

VS

Haval | Jolion 1.5T Basic

Lynk & Co | Lynk&Co 06 Core Plus

VS

Jeep | Renegade 2.4L Sport (4x2)

Lynk & Co | Lynk&Co 06 Core Plus

VS

Toyota | Toyota Urban Cruiser 2023 1.5L GL

Lynk & Co | Lynk&Co 06 Core Plus

VS

Haval | Haval H6 2021 Supreme

Lynk & Co | Lynk&Co 06 Core Plus

VS

Opel | Opel Crossland X 2020 1.2T Ultimate

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Lynk&Co 06 Core Plus has a fuel consumption of 6.40, while iCAUR V27 Classic has a fuel consumption of 1.8. Therefore, iCAUR V27 Classic is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Lynk&Co 06 Core Plus has a wheelbase of 2640, while iCAUR V27 Classic has a wheelbase of 2900. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, iCAUR V27 Classic, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Lynk&Co 06 Core Plus uses Front Drive, while iCAUR V27 Classic uses Rear Drive.