Lynk&Co 06 Hyper Pro vs Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
195
/
1499
/
/
4
/
GCC
Dimensions
5
7 Seater
1440
/
18"
/
4340
4950 mm
1820
1930 mm
1625
1730 mm
2640
2850 mm
1025
/
5.5
/
172
/
/
5 Doors
Fuel Economy
15.6
20 Km/L
51
65 L
/
20 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Interior
Driver Seat
/
12.3"
/
✓
/
✓
/
10.25"
/
Leather
/
Dual
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Sport
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
6
/
Transmission
✓
/
7DCT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
All Wheel Drive
Macphersan Independent with stabilizer bar
/
Multi-link Independent with stabilizer bar
/
EPAS
/
Wheels/brakes
Ventilated
/
Solid
/
215/55 R18
/
215/55 R18
/
Key Spec
1.5 L
2.5 L - 2.5 L
181 BHP
240 - 240
7DCT
CVT & Electronically controlled Continuously Variable Transmission (ECVT)
Gasoline
Hybrid
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
7 - 7
Exterior
كهربائي
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
1.5
2.5 L
Gasoline
Hybrid
181 HP
240 BHP
5500
/
290
237 Nm
3500
/
/
In-Line
/
None
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Economic/Sport/Comfort/Intelligent
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Lynk&Co 06 Hyper Pro
- 360 Degree Camera
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Keyless Start
- Steering Adjustment
- Rear Cross Traffic Alert
- Intelligent Emergency Call
- Rollover stability control
- Blind Spot Warning
- Seatbelt pretensioner
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
- Seat belt reminder
Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD)
- Rear Camera
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Lynk&Co 06 Hyper Pro if you care more about overall equipment; choose Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) if you care more about fuel economy.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Lynk&Co 06 Hyper Pro has a fuel consumption of 6.40, while Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) has a fuel consumption of 5. Therefore, Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Lynk&Co 06 Hyper Pro has a wheelbase of 2640, while Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) has a wheelbase of 2850 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Lynk&Co 06 Hyper Pro uses Front Drive, while Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive.