Lynk&Co 09 Pro vs GS 8 2.0T GL (2WD) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
215
200 km/h
Dimensions
7
7 Seater
2120
/
20"
/
5042
4980 mm
1977
1950 mm
1780
1780 mm
2984
2920 mm
221
/
Fuel Economy
12.6
13.3 Km/L
/
66 L
/
13.3 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
14.6"
/
✓
/
✓
/
12.3"
/
Nappa
/
✓
/
Dual
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
10
/
Transmission
8AT
/
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
AWD
/
SLA Suspension
/
Multi Link
/
EPAS
/
Wheels/brakes
275/45 R20
/
275/45 R20
/
Key Spec
2.0 L - 2.0 L
2 L - 2 L
254 - 254
187 BHP - 332 BHP
8AT & Automatic
8-Speed Automatic & 8AT & AISIN 8AT & Automatic & CVT
Gasoline & Hybrid
Petrol & Gasoline & Hybrid
TBD
TBD
7
7 Seater - 7 Seater
Exterior
كهربائي
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
2.0
2.0 L
Hybrid
Gasoline
254
248 BHP
5500
/
350
400 Nm
4800
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Eco/Sports/Comfort/Off-road/Individual
/
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Lynk&Co 09 Pro
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree Camera
- Keyless Entry
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Steering Adjustment
- Emergency Lane Keeping (ELK）
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Rollover stability control
- Collision Detection
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Child Lock
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
- Seat belt reminder
GS 8 2.0T GL (2WD)
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Lynk&Co 09 Pro if you care more about price; choose GS 8 2.0T GL (2WD) if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Lynk&Co 09 Pro has a fuel consumption of 7.94, while GS 8 2.0T GL (2WD) has a fuel consumption of 7.52. Therefore, GS 8 2.0T GL (2WD) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Lynk&Co 09 Pro has a wheelbase of 2984, while GS 8 2.0T GL (2WD) has a wheelbase of 2920 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Lynk&Co 09 Pro, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Lynk&Co 09 Pro uses Four-Wheel Drive, while GS 8 2.0T GL (2WD) uses Front Wheel Drive.