Lynk&Co 09 Pro vs iCAUR V27 Classic Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
215
/
Dimensions
7
5
2120
/
20"
19"
5042
5045
1977
1976
1780
1894
2984
2900
221
/
/
/
Fuel Economy
12.6
55
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
Front Row Seats
Front Row Seats
14.6"
15.4"
✓
/
✓
/
12.3"
8.88"
Nappa
/
✓
/
Dual
Dual
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
6
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
10
/
/
✓
Battery/Charging
/
0.5
Transmission
8AT
AT
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
Rear Drive
AWD
/
SLA Suspension
MacPherson
Multi Link
Multi Link
EPAS
/
Wheels/brakes
275/45 R20
255/55 R19
275/45 R20
255/55 R19
Key Spec
2.0 L - 2.0 L
/
254 - 254
248 - 450
8AT & Automatic
AT
Gasoline & Hybrid
Electric
TBD
/
7
5
/
TBD
/
TBD
Exterior
كهربائي
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0
1.5
Hybrid
Electric
254
248
5500
/
350
300
4800
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Eco/Sports/Comfort/Off-road/Individual
Snow, Sand, Etc
✓
/
/
/
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Motor
/
185
Comparison of configuration highlights
Lynk&Co 09 Pro
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree Camera
- Keyless Entry
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Steering Adjustment
- Emergency Lane Keeping (ELK）
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Rollover stability control
- Collision Detection
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Child Lock
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
- Seat belt reminder
iCAUR V27 Classic
- Rear Cross Traffic Alert
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Driving Recorder
- Rollover stability control
- Collision Detection
- Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Lynk&Co 09 Pro if you care more about interior space; choose iCAUR V27 Classic if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Lynk&Co 09 Pro has a fuel consumption of 7.94, while iCAUR V27 Classic has a fuel consumption of 1.8. Therefore, iCAUR V27 Classic is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Lynk&Co 09 Pro has a wheelbase of 2984, while iCAUR V27 Classic has a wheelbase of 2900. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Lynk&Co 09 Pro, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Lynk&Co 09 Pro uses Four-Wheel Drive, while iCAUR V27 Classic uses Rear Drive.