Lynk&Co 900 vs Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) Comparison

Car Information

4.6

/

5240*1999*1810

/

170

/

52.38

/

Engine / Motor

210

161 km/h

4

/

Dimensions

6

5 Seater

2810

/

21"

/

5240

4341 mm

1999

1804 mm

1810

1693 mm

3160

2676 mm

194

/

/

414 L

Fuel Economy

60

50 L

/

17.2 Km/L

/

17.2 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

NFC / DIGITAL

/

Interior

/

/

Front and Back Row Seats

/

All Seats

/

Triple

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

30"

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

31

/

Doly Surround Sound

/

Battery/Charging

17

/

Chassis & Steering

Closed-Type Dual Chamber Air Suspension

/

/

Four-Wheel Drive

Front Wheel Drive

E-AWD

/

Double Wishbone

/

5-Link Independent

/

Wheels/brakes

275/45R21

/

275/45R21

/

Key Spec

2.0 L - 2.0 L

1.6 L - 2.0 L

530 BHP - 540 BHP

105 BHP - 135 BHP

DHT

Automatic & CVT & Manual

Gasoline & Hybrid

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

6

5 - 5

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.0

1.6 L

Hybrid

Gasoline

/

115 BHP

/

156 Nm

Motor

Ternary Lithium Battery

/

/

/

Permanent-magnet Synchronous Motor

/

528

/

123

/

Front (P2) + Rear (P4)

/

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Hybrid / Pure / EV / Performance / Snow / Offroad

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Lynk&Co 900

    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Rear Camera
    • Remote key types
    • Emergency Lane Keeping (ELK)
    • Front Cross Traffic Alert
    • Rear Cross Traffic Alert
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Lane Following Assist
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Lane Departure Warning
    • Lane Keeping Assist
  • Duster 1.6L PE (4x2)

    • ABS

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickDuster 1.6L PE (4x2)

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Lynk&Co 900 if you care more about interior space; choose Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Lynk & Co | Lynk&Co 900

VS

Jeep | Jeep Wrangler Rubicon 3.6L 4 Door

Lynk & Co | Lynk&Co 900

VS

Audi | Q5 45 TFSI quattro Advanced 2.0L (245 HP)

Lynk & Co | Lynk&Co 900

VS

Genesis | Genesis GV80 2023 2.5T Premium

Lynk & Co | Lynk&Co 900

VS

Toyota | Toyota Land Cruiser 2022 4.0L GXR

Lynk & Co | Lynk&Co 900

VS

Toyota | Toyota Land Cruiser 2018 4.0L GXR

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Lynk&Co 900 has a fuel consumption of No data, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) has a fuel consumption of 5.81. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Lynk&Co 900 has a wheelbase of 3160, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) has a wheelbase of 2676 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Lynk&Co 900 , offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Lynk&Co 900 uses Four-Wheel Drive, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) uses Front Wheel Drive.