CarteaCompare CarsLynk&Co 900 vs G700 Comfort

Lynk&Co 900 vs G700 Comfort Comparison

Car Information

4.6

4.6

5240*1999*1810

/

170

/

52.38

34.13

Engine / Motor

210

/

4

/

Dimensions

6

5

2810

/

21"

/

5240

5198

1999

2050

1810

1956

3160

2870

194

230

/

1730

/

1730

Fuel Economy

60

100

/

11.6

Comfort

/

/

NFC / DIGITAL

/

/

/

Interior

/

Front and Back Row Seats

Front Row Seats

All Seats

/

Triple

/

/

/

/

/

Front & Back Row Seats

/

35.4

/

/

/

Front Row Seats

/

Leather

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

30"

/

15.6

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

31

12

Doly Surround Sound

/

Battery/Charging

17

/

Transmission

/

2 DHT

/

Chassis & Steering

Closed-Type Dual Chamber Air Suspension

/

/

Four-Wheel Drive

Front Drive

E-AWD

/

Double Wishbone

/

5-Link Independent

/

Wheels/brakes

275/45R21

275/60 R20

275/45R21

275/60 R20

Key Spec

2.0 L - 2.0 L

2.0

530 BHP - 540 BHP

694

DHT

2 DHT

Gasoline & Hybrid

Hybrid

TBD

TBD

6

5 - 6

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.0

2.0

Hybrid

Hybrid

/

694

/

795

Motor

Ternary Lithium Battery

/

/

/

Permanent-magnet Synchronous Motor

/

528

/

123

/

Front (P2) + Rear (P4)

/

Technologies

/

/

/

6

/

Smart Hybrid / Pure / EV / Performance / Snow / Offroad

SPORT/ECO/NORMAL

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Lynk&Co 900

    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Rear Camera
    • Remote key types
    • Emergency Lane Keeping (ELK)
    • Front Cross Traffic Alert
    • Rear Cross Traffic Alert
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Lane Following Assist
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Lane Departure Warning
    • Lane Keeping Assist
  • G700 Comfort

    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Keyless Entry
    • Keyless Start
    • Child Safety Monitoring System
    • Lane Following Assist
    • Collision Detection
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
    • Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
    • Active Safety Warning System
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Lane Departure Warning
    • Lane Keeping Assist

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickG700 Comfort

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Lynk&Co 900 if you care more about interior space; choose G700 Comfort if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Lynk & Co | Lynk&Co 900

VS

Jeep | Jeep Wrangler Rubicon 3.6L 4 Door

Lynk & Co | Lynk&Co 900

VS

Audi | Q5 45 TFSI quattro Advanced 2.0L (245 HP)

Lynk & Co | Lynk&Co 900

VS

Genesis | Genesis GV80 2023 2.5T Premium

Lynk & Co | Lynk&Co 900

VS

Toyota | Toyota Land Cruiser 2022 4.0L GXR

Lynk & Co | Lynk&Co 900

VS

Toyota | Toyota Land Cruiser 2018 4.0L GXR

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Lynk&Co 900 has a fuel consumption of No data, while G700 Comfort has a fuel consumption of 8.62. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Lynk&Co 900 has a wheelbase of 3160, while G700 Comfort has a wheelbase of 2870. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Lynk&Co 900 , offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Lynk&Co 900 uses Four-Wheel Drive, while G700 Comfort uses Front Drive.