Lynk&Co 900 vs Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
210
/
4
4
/
GCC
Dimensions
6
7 Seater
2810
/
21"
/
5240
4950 mm
1999
1930 mm
1810
1730 mm
3160
2850 mm
194
/
/
5 Doors
Fuel Economy
60
65 L
/
20 Km/L
/
20 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
NFC / DIGITAL
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
Front and Back Row Seats
/
All Seats
/
Triple
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
30"
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
31
/
Doly Surround Sound
/
Battery/Charging
17
/
Transmission
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Closed-Type Dual Chamber Air Suspension
/
✓
/
Four-Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
E-AWD
/
Double Wishbone
/
5-Link Independent
/
Wheels/brakes
275/45R21
/
275/45R21
/
Key Spec
2.0 L - 2.0 L
2.5 L - 2.5 L
530 BHP - 540 BHP
240 BHP - 240 BHP
DHT
Automatic & CVT & eCVT & Electronically controlled Continuously Variable Transmission (ECVT)
Gasoline & Hybrid
Hybrid & Hybrid
TBD
TBD
6
7 Seater - 7 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
2.0
2.5 L
Hybrid
Hybrid
/
240 BHP
/
In-Line
/
None
/
4
/
237 Nm
Motor
Ternary Lithium Battery
/
/
/
Permanent-magnet Synchronous Motor
/
528
/
123
/
Front (P2) + Rear (P4)
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Hybrid / Pure / EV / Performance / Snow / Offroad
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Lynk&Co 900
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree Camera
- Rear Camera
- Remote key types
- Emergency Lane Keeping (ELK）
- Front Cross Traffic Alert
- Rear Cross Traffic Alert
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Lane Following Assist
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD)
- Rear Camera
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Lynk&Co 900 if you care more about interior space; choose Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Lynk&Co 900 has a fuel consumption of No data, while Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) has a fuel consumption of 5. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Lynk&Co 900 has a wheelbase of 3160, while Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) has a wheelbase of 2850 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Lynk&Co 900 , offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Lynk&Co 900 uses Four-Wheel Drive, while Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive.