Lynk&Co 900 vs Kicks 1.6 S Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
210
180 km/h
4
4
/
1590 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
6
5 Seater
2810
/
21"
/
5240
4295 mm
1999
1960 mm
1810
1590 mm
3160
2620 mm
194
/
/
5 Doors
/
432 L
Fuel Economy
60
41 L
/
15.4 Km/L
/
15.4 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
NFC / DIGITAL
/
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
Front and Back Row Seats
/
All Seats
/
Triple
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
30"
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
31
/
Doly Surround Sound
/
Battery/Charging
17
/
Transmission
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Closed-Type Dual Chamber Air Suspension
/
✓
/
Four-Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
E-AWD
/
Double Wishbone
/
5-Link Independent
/
Wheels/brakes
275/45R21
/
275/45R21
/
Key Spec
2.0 L - 2.0 L
1.6 L - 1598 L
530 BHP - 540 BHP
118 BHP
DHT
Automatic
Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
6
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
2.0
1.6 L
Hybrid
Hybrid
/
118 BHP
/
In-Line
/
None
/
4
/
149 Nm
Motor
Ternary Lithium Battery
/
/
/
Permanent-magnet Synchronous Motor
/
528
/
123
/
Front (P2) + Rear (P4)
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Hybrid / Pure / EV / Performance / Snow / Offroad
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Lynk&Co 900
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree Camera
- Rear Camera
- Remote key types
- Emergency Lane Keeping (ELK）
- Front Cross Traffic Alert
- Rear Cross Traffic Alert
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Lane Following Assist
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
Kicks 1.6 S
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Modern and trend compliant design
- High fuel economy for efficiency
- Effective use of internal space
Negative
- Engine performance is limited
- Slow transmission response
- The quality of interior materials is average
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Lynk&Co 900 if you care more about interior space; choose Kicks 1.6 S if you care more about overall equipment.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Lynk&Co 900 has a fuel consumption of No data, while Kicks 1.6 S has a fuel consumption of 6.49. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Lynk&Co 900 has a wheelbase of 3160, while Kicks 1.6 S has a wheelbase of 2620 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Lynk&Co 900 , offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Lynk&Co 900 uses Four-Wheel Drive, while Kicks 1.6 S uses Front Wheel Drive.