Lynk&Co 900 vs Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
210
190 km/h
4
4
/
3490 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
6
7 Seater
2810
/
21"
/
5240
5004 mm
1999
1978 mm
1810
1802 mm
3160
2900 mm
194
/
/
5 Doors
/
470 L
Fuel Economy
60
74 L
/
9.4 Km/L
/
9.4 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
NFC / DIGITAL
/
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
Front and Back Row Seats
/
All Seats
/
Triple
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
30"
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
31
/
Doly Surround Sound
/
Battery/Charging
17
/
Transmission
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Closed-Type Dual Chamber Air Suspension
/
✓
/
Four-Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
E-AWD
/
Double Wishbone
/
5-Link Independent
/
Wheels/brakes
275/45R21
/
275/45R21
/
Key Spec
2.0 L - 2.0 L
3.5 L - 3498 L
530 BHP - 540 BHP
254 BHP - 271 BHP
DHT
9AT & Automatic
Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
6
7 - 8
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
2.0
3.5 L
Hybrid
Gasoline
/
271 BHP
/
In-Line
/
None
/
4
/
340 Nm
Motor
Ternary Lithium Battery
/
/
/
Permanent-magnet Synchronous Motor
/
528
/
123
/
Front (P2) + Rear (P4)
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Hybrid / Pure / EV / Performance / Snow / Offroad
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Lynk&Co 900
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree Camera
- Rear Camera
- Remote key types
- Emergency Lane Keeping (ELK）
- Front Cross Traffic Alert
- Rear Cross Traffic Alert
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Lane Following Assist
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Spacious interior space and flexible storage
- Comfortable seating and luxurious driving experience
- Comprehensive and advanced security equipment
Negative
- Medium fuel economy
- Traditional interior design needs updating
- Noticeable noise during high speeds
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Lynk&Co 900 if you care more about interior space; choose Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD if you care more about overall equipment.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Lynk&Co 900 has a fuel consumption of No data, while Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD has a fuel consumption of 10.64. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Lynk&Co 900 has a wheelbase of 3160, while Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD has a wheelbase of 2900 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Lynk&Co 900 , offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Lynk&Co 900 uses Four-Wheel Drive, while Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD uses Front Wheel Drive.