Lynk&Co 900 vs RX Comfort 2.0T Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
210
185 km/h
4
4
/
1998 cc
/
Chinese
Dimensions
6
5 Seater
2810
/
21"
/
5240
4781 mm
1999
1920 mm
1810
1671 mm
3160
2815 mm
194
187 m
/
5 Doors
/
500 L
Fuel Economy
60
50 L
/
16 Km/L
/
16 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
NFC / DIGITAL
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
Front and Back Row Seats
/
All Seats
/
Triple
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
30"
/
✓
12.3
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Android LCD
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
31
8
Doly Surround Sound
/
/
✓
/
✓
Battery/Charging
17
/
Chassis & Steering
Closed-Type Dual Chamber Air Suspension
/
✓
/
Four-Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
E-AWD
/
Double Wishbone
/
5-Link Independent
/
Wheels/brakes
275/45R21
/
275/45R21
/
Key Spec
2.0 L - 2.0 L
2.0 L - 2.0 L
530 BHP - 540 BHP
245 HP - 261 BHP
DHT
7DCT & 8AT & Automatic
Gasoline & Hybrid
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
6
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0
2.0 L
Hybrid
Gasoline
/
261 BHP
/
In-Line
/
Twin Turbo
/
4
/
400 Nm
Motor
Ternary Lithium Battery
/
/
/
Permanent-magnet Synchronous Motor
/
528
/
123
/
Front (P2) + Rear (P4)
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Hybrid / Pure / EV / Performance / Snow / Offroad
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Lynk&Co 900
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree Camera
- Rear Camera
- Remote key types
- Emergency Lane Keeping (ELK）
- Front Cross Traffic Alert
- Rear Cross Traffic Alert
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Lane Following Assist
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
RX Comfort 2.0T
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Lynk&Co 900 if you care more about interior space; choose RX Comfort 2.0T if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Lynk&Co 900 has a fuel consumption of No data, while RX Comfort 2.0T has a fuel consumption of 6.25. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Lynk&Co 900 has a wheelbase of 3160, while RX Comfort 2.0T has a wheelbase of 2815 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Lynk&Co 900 , offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Lynk&Co 900 uses Four-Wheel Drive, while RX Comfort 2.0T uses Front Wheel Drive.