Lynk&Co 900 vs T2 i-DM Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
210
200
4
4
/
Chinese
Dimensions
6
5
2810
/
21"
/
5240
4785
1999
2006
1810
1875
3160
2800
194
220
/
5
/
752
Fuel Economy
60
70 L
/
18.5
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
NFC / DIGITAL
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
Front and Back Row Seats
✓
All Seats
/
Triple
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
30"
/
✓
15.6
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Android LCD
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
31
12
Doly Surround Sound
/
/
✓
/
✓
Battery/Charging
17
/
Transmission
/
DHT
Chassis & Steering
Closed-Type Dual Chamber Air Suspension
/
✓
/
Four-Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
E-AWD
/
Double Wishbone
/
5-Link Independent
/
Wheels/brakes
275/45R21
/
275/45R21
/
Key Spec
2.0 L - 2.0 L
1.5
530 BHP - 540 BHP
154 BHP - 600
DHT
3DHT & DHT
Gasoline & Hybrid
Hybrid
TBD
TBD
6
5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0
1.5
Hybrid
Hybrid
/
154 BHP
/
In-Line
/
4
/
220
Motor
Ternary Lithium Battery
/
/
/
Permanent-magnet Synchronous Motor
/
528
/
123
/
Front (P2) + Rear (P4)
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Hybrid / Pure / EV / Performance / Snow / Offroad
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Lynk&Co 900
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree Camera
- Rear Camera
- Remote key types
- Emergency Lane Keeping (ELK）
- Front Cross Traffic Alert
- Rear Cross Traffic Alert
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Lane Following Assist
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
T2 i-DM
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Attractive and modern exterior design
- High fuel efficiency
- Efficient hybrid propulsion system
Negative
- Luggage compartment space is limited
- Lack of digital entertainment options
- Traction ability is not the best in its class
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Lynk&Co 900 if you care more about interior space; choose T2 i-DM if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Lynk&Co 900 has a fuel consumption of No data, while T2 i-DM has a fuel consumption of 5.41. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Lynk&Co 900 has a wheelbase of 3160, while T2 i-DM has a wheelbase of 2800. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Lynk&Co 900 , offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Lynk&Co 900 uses Four-Wheel Drive, while T2 i-DM uses Four Wheel Drive.