Lynk&Co 900 vs XTrail S 2WD (5-Seater) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
210
200 km/h
4
4
/
2490 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
6
5 Seater
2810
/
21"
/
5240
4680 mm
1999
1840 mm
1810
1725 mm
3160
2706 mm
194
/
/
5 Doors
/
550 L
Fuel Economy
60
60 L
/
15.6 Km/L
/
15.6 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
NFC / DIGITAL
/
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
Front and Back Row Seats
/
All Seats
/
Triple
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
30"
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
31
/
Doly Surround Sound
/
Battery/Charging
17
/
Transmission
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Closed-Type Dual Chamber Air Suspension
/
✓
/
Four-Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
E-AWD
/
Double Wishbone
/
5-Link Independent
/
Wheels/brakes
275/45R21
/
275/45R21
/
Key Spec
2.0 L - 2.0 L
2.5 L
530 BHP - 540 BHP
132 BHP - 188 BHP
DHT
Automatic & CVT & Xtronic CVT
Gasoline & Hybrid
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
6
5 Seater - 7 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
2.0
2.5 L
Hybrid
Gasoline
/
188 BHP
/
In-Line
/
None
/
4
/
244 Nm
Motor
Ternary Lithium Battery
/
/
/
Permanent-magnet Synchronous Motor
/
528
/
123
/
Front (P2) + Rear (P4)
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Hybrid / Pure / EV / Performance / Snow / Offroad
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Lynk&Co 900
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree Camera
- Rear Camera
- Remote key types
- Emergency Lane Keeping (ELK）
- Front Cross Traffic Alert
- Rear Cross Traffic Alert
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Lane Following Assist
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
XTrail S 2WD (5-Seater)
- 360 Degree camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Excellent off-road driving performance and stable control
- Spacious interior space suitable for families and luggage
- High safety equipment increases confidence while driving
Negative
- Motor performance is less responsive in acceleration
- Fuel consumption is high in the city
- The quality of interior materials and technology need to be improved
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Lynk&Co 900 if you care more about interior space; choose XTrail S 2WD (5-Seater) if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Lynk&Co 900 has a fuel consumption of No data, while XTrail S 2WD (5-Seater) has a fuel consumption of 6.41. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Lynk&Co 900 has a wheelbase of 3160, while XTrail S 2WD (5-Seater) has a wheelbase of 2706 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Lynk&Co 900 , offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Lynk&Co 900 uses Four-Wheel Drive, while XTrail S 2WD (5-Seater) uses Front Wheel Drive.