M4 Cargo Van vs Carnival 3.5L EX AT 12 Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

160

/

4

/

/

3.5 Liter

Dimensions

2

8

5200

5155

1890

1995

1980

1740

3080

/

/

18

Fuel Economy

80

72

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

Front Row Seats

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

4.2

/

/

Safety

7

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

/

/

12

/

/

/

/

/

Transmission

/

8 Speed AT

/

8 Speed AT

Chassis & Steering

/

/

Front Wheel Drive

/

/

MOTOR DRIVEN POWER STEERING

Wheels/brakes

/

/

/

235/60 R18

/

235/60 R18

Key Spec

2.0 L

3.3 L - 3.5 L

145 BHP

245 - 290

5MT

8 Speed AT & 8 Speed AT w/E-SHIFT (SWB) & Automatic & Automatic

Gasoline

Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol

TBD

TBD

2 - 9

7 - 8

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.0 L

3.5

Gasoline

Gasoline

145 BHP

268 BHP

185

/

/

3.5 Liters, 3,470 cc, 6 Cylinders, 24 VALVE, DOHC

/

6

/

268 hp / 6,400 rpm

/

33.8 Kg.m (331.5 Nm) /5,000 rpm

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comfort - Eco - Sports - Smart

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • M4 Cargo Van

    • Rear AC Controls
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Number of Airbags
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Collision Detection
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • Active braking
  • Carnival 3.5L EX AT 12

    • Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
    • Keyless Entry
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Number of Airbags
    • Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickM4 Cargo Van

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose M4 Cargo Van if you care more about price; choose Carnival 3.5L EX AT 12 if you care more about power.

Popular Car Comparisons

JAC | M4 Cargo Van

VS

Suzuki | Suzuki Ertiga 2023 1.5L GL

JAC | M4 Cargo Van

VS

Suzuki | Suzuki Ertiga 2018 1.4L GL

JAC | M4 Cargo Van

VS

Suzuki | Suzuki Ertiga 2019 1.5L GLX

JAC | M4 Cargo Van

VS

Suzuki | Suzuki Ertiga 2020 1.5L GLX

JAC | M4 Cargo Van

VS

Suzuki | Suzuki Ertiga 2022 1.5L GLX

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, M4 Cargo Van has a fuel consumption of No data, while Carnival 3.5L EX AT 12 has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, M4 Cargo Van has a wheelbase of 3080, while Carnival 3.5L EX AT 12 has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. M4 Cargo Van uses Front Wheel Drive, while Carnival 3.5L EX AT 12 uses No data.