M4 Passenger vs GN6 1.5T GE Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
160
/
Dimensions
Sliding Door
/
9
7 Seater
2020
/
16
/
5200
4780 mm
1890
1860 mm
1980
1730 mm
3080
2810 mm
160
/
/
options.1,100 L
Fuel Economy
/
14.9 Km/L
80
55 L
/
14.9 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
2
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
6
/
Transmission
5
/
5MT
/
Chassis & Steering
Dual Swing Arm Independent
/
Dependent steel leaf spring suspension
/
/
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
Disc
/
Disc
/
215/65 R16
/
215/65 R16
/
Key Spec
2.0 L
1.5 L
145 BHP
169 BHP
5MT
TBD
Gasoline
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
2 - 9
7 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
2.0 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
2.0L VVT
/
145 BHP
169 BHP
185
265 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
M4 Passenger
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Parking sensor rear
- Rear Camera
- Number of Airbags
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
GN6 1.5T GE
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickM4 Passenger
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose M4 Passenger if you care more about price; choose GN6 1.5T GE if you care more about power.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, M4 Passenger has a fuel consumption of No data, while GN6 1.5T GE has a fuel consumption of 6.71. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, M4 Passenger has a wheelbase of 3080, while GN6 1.5T GE has a wheelbase of 2810 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, M4 Passenger, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. M4 Passenger uses No data, while GN6 1.5T GE uses Front Wheel Drive.