M4 Passenger vs Toyota Sienna L Comparison
Car Information
MPV
/
Engine / Motor
160
180 km/h
/
4
/
2490 cc
/
American
Dimensions
Sliding Door
/
9
8 Seater
2020
/
16
/
5200
5180 mm
1890
1990 mm
1980
1780 mm
3080
3060 mm
160
210 mm
/
5 Doors
Fuel Economy
/
/
80
85 L
/
10 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
2
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
6
/
/
✓
Transmission
5
/
5MT
/
Chassis & Steering
Dual Swing Arm Independent
McPherson Strut Coil Springs
Dependent steel leaf spring suspension
Torsion Beam with Coil Springs
/
All Wheel Drive
/
Electric Power Steering (EPS)
Wheels/brakes
Disc
/
Disc
/
215/65 R16
/
215/65 R16
/
Key Spec
2.0 L
2.5 L
145 BHP
245 BHP
5MT
Automatic
Gasoline
Hybrid
TBD
TBD
2 - 9
8 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
2.5 L
Gasoline
Hybrid
2.0L VVT
/
145 BHP
245 BHP
185
370 Nm
/
In-Line
/
Twin Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
M4 Passenger
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Parking sensor rear
- Rear Camera
- Number of Airbags
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
Toyota Sienna L
- Remote key types
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickToyota Sienna L
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose M4 Passenger if you care more about interior space; choose Toyota Sienna L if you care more about power.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, M4 Passenger has a fuel consumption of No data, while Toyota Sienna L has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, M4 Passenger has a wheelbase of 3080, while Toyota Sienna L has a wheelbase of 3060 mm . Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, M4 Passenger, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. M4 Passenger uses No data, while Toyota Sienna L uses All Wheel Drive .