Macan 4 Electric vs XTS 3.6L Luxury Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
220 km/h
210 km/h
GCC
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
5 Doors
/
4784 mm
5131 mm
2152 mm
1852 mm
1622 mm
1501 mm
2893 mm
2837 mm
540 L
510 L
187 m
/
Fuel Economy
/
8.5 Km/L
/
76 L
/
8.5 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
12.6
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard LCD
/
✓
/
14
/
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L - 3.6 L
3.6 L
245 BHP - 440 BHP
304 BHP - 410 BHP
Automatic
Automatic
Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
Electric
Gasoline
400 BHP
304 BHP
650 Nm
355 Nm
/
3.6 L
Motor
11
/
options.Lithium
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Macan 4 Electric
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Sensor Rear Tailgate
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
XTS 3.6L Luxury
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- Exceptional driving experience with high precision
- Luxurious interior design with high-quality materials
- The attractiveness of the Porsche brand
Negative
- Limited interior space for seats and trunk
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Low suitability for everyday practical use
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickXTS 3.6L Luxury
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Macan 4 Electric if you care more about interior space; choose XTS 3.6L Luxury if you care more about power.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Macan 4 Electric has a fuel consumption of No data, while XTS 3.6L Luxury has a fuel consumption of 11.76. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Macan 4 Electric has a wheelbase of 2893 mm, while XTS 3.6L Luxury has a wheelbase of 2837 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Macan 4 Electric, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Macan 4 Electric uses All Wheel Drive, while XTS 3.6L Luxury uses All Wheel Drive.