Macan GTS 2.9L (435 HP) vs CRV DX (2WD) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
272 km/h
200 km/h
6
4
2894 cc
1490 cc
GCC
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
5 Doors
5 Doors
4726 mm
4706 mm
2097 mm
1866 mm
1621 mm
1681 mm
2893 mm
2700 mm
488 L
375 L
187 m
/
Fuel Economy
8 Km/L
11 Km/L
65 L
58 L
8 Km/L
11 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
10.9
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
14
/
Transmission
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L - 3.6 L
1.5 L - 2.4 L
245 BHP - 635 BHP
184 BHP - 190
Automatic
Automatic & CVT
Diesel & Electric & Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 Seater - 7
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
V
In-Line
2.9 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
4
4
435 BHP
190 BHP
550 Nm
243 Nm
/
Single Turbo
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Macan GTS 2.9L (435 HP)
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Sensor Rear Tailgate
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
CRV DX (2WD)
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- Exceptional driving experience with high precision
- Luxurious interior design with high-quality materials
- The attractiveness of the Porsche brand
Negative
- Limited interior space for seats and trunk
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Low suitability for everyday practical use
Positive
- High reliability and durable performance
- A wide range of security technologies
- Excellent fuel efficiency
Negative
- The price is higher than some competitors
- Lack of hybrid drive options in some markets
- Limited charging capacity compared to some competitors
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Macan GTS 2.9L (435 HP) if you care more about interior space; choose CRV DX (2WD) if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Macan GTS 2.9L (435 HP) has a fuel consumption of 12.5, while CRV DX (2WD) has a fuel consumption of 9.09. Therefore, CRV DX (2WD) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Macan GTS 2.9L (435 HP) has a wheelbase of 2893 mm, while CRV DX (2WD) has a wheelbase of 2700 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Macan GTS 2.9L (435 HP), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Macan GTS 2.9L (435 HP) uses All Wheel Drive, while CRV DX (2WD) uses Front Wheel Drive.