Macan GTS 2.9L (435 HP) vs iX xDrive40 Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
272 km/h
200 km/h
6
/
2894 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
5 Doors
/
4726 mm
4953 mm
2097 mm
1967 mm
1621 mm
1695 mm
2893 mm
3000 mm
488 L
500 L
187 m
/
Fuel Economy
8 Km/L
/
65 L
/
8 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
10.9
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
14
/
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L - 3.6 L
/
245 BHP - 635 BHP
326 BHP - 619 BHP
Automatic
TBD
Diesel & Electric & Gasoline & Petrol
Electric
TBD
/
5 Seater
5 Seater
/
TBD
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
V
/
2.9 L
/
Gasoline
Electric
4
/
435 BHP
326 BHP
550 Nm
630 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Macan GTS 2.9L (435 HP)
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Sensor Rear Tailgate
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
iX xDrive40
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- Exceptional driving experience with high precision
- Luxurious interior design with high-quality materials
- The attractiveness of the Porsche brand
Negative
- Limited interior space for seats and trunk
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Low suitability for everyday practical use
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickMacan GTS 2.9L (435 HP)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Macan GTS 2.9L (435 HP) if you care more about price; choose iX xDrive40 if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Macan GTS 2.9L (435 HP) has a fuel consumption of 12.5, while iX xDrive40 has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Macan GTS 2.9L (435 HP) has a wheelbase of 2893 mm, while iX xDrive40 has a wheelbase of 3000 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, iX xDrive40, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Macan GTS 2.9L (435 HP) uses All Wheel Drive, while iX xDrive40 uses All Wheel Drive.