Mage E1 vs Qin Plus FWD Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
190
185
4
/
Dimensions
5
5
1480
1500
19
17
4650
4765
1905
1837
1630
1495
2775
2720
/
Flush Door
/
4
/
500
Fuel Economy
15.8
26
51
48
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
10.25
8.8
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
LCD
/
Front Row Seats
/
Sensatec Leather
/
✓
/
Dual
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
4
Driver's and Passenger airbags, Front-row side airbag
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
Front Row
Infotainment
13.2
10.1-inch rotating screen
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
6
6
/
✓
/
✓
Battery/Charging
/
6.6
Transmission
AT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Drive
/
MacPherson
/
Torsion Beam
Wheels/brakes
235/55 R19
215/55 R17
235/55 R19
215/55 R17
/
Ventilated Disc
/
Disc
Key Spec
1.5
1.5 L
202 BHP
177 BHP - 197 BHP
7AT & AT
Automatic
Gasoline
Hybrid
TBD
TBD
5
5
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
Manual
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5
1.5 L
Gasoline
Hybrid
202 BHP
197 BHP
305
325
/
Plug in Hybrid
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
Sport, Ordinary, Economical
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Motor
/
145
/
325
/
1
/
Lithium iron phosphate battery
Comparison of configuration highlights
Mage E1
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- 360 Degree Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
Qin Plus FWD
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Number of Airbags
- ABS
- EBA/BA
- Child Lock
- Seat belt reminder
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Mage E1 if you care more about price; choose Qin Plus FWD if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Mage E1 has a fuel consumption of 6.33, while Qin Plus FWD has a fuel consumption of 3.85. Therefore, Qin Plus FWD is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Mage E1 has a wheelbase of 2775, while Qin Plus FWD has a wheelbase of 2720. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Mage E1, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mage E1 uses Front Drive, while Qin Plus FWD uses Front Drive.