Mage E2 vs Ciciv SPORT Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
190
200
4
/
Dimensions
5
5
1480
/
20
/
4650
4689
1905
1801
1630
1415
2775
,735
Fuel Economy
15.8
/
51
47
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
10.25
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
4
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
13.2
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
6
8
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
AT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
/
Wheels/brakes
235/50 R20
/
235/50 R20
/
Key Spec
1.5
1.5 L - 2.0 L
202 BHP
123 BHP - 180 BHP
7AT & AT
Automatic & CVT
Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5
2.0
Gasoline
Gasoline
202 BHP
150
305
181
/
112
/
6400
/
5000
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Mage E2
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- 360 Degree Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
Ciciv SPORT
- Push Button Start
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Cross Traffic Alert
- Child Safety Monitoring System
- Collision Safety Door Latch Open System
- Collision Safety Cut-Out
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Driving Recorder
- Security System
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- ABS
- EBA/BA
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- High fuel efficiency
- Long lasting reliability
- High quality interior design
Negative
- Limited rear space for passengers
- Average off road performance
- An insufficiently innovative infotainment system
Related comparisons
Editor's PickMage E2
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Mage E2 if you care more about price; choose Ciciv SPORT if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Mage E2 has a fuel consumption of 6.33, while Ciciv SPORT has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Mage E2 has a wheelbase of 2775, while Ciciv SPORT has a wheelbase of ,735. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Mage E2, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mage E2 uses Front Drive, while Ciciv SPORT uses No data.