Mage E2 vs Mazda 6 2023 2.5L V w/ Sunroof Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
190
220
4
N/A
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
1480
/
20
✓
4650
4.850
1905
1.840
1630
1.450
2775
2.830
/
419
Fuel Economy
15.8
12.2
51
62
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
10.25
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
4
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Infotainment
13.2
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
6
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
AT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
235/50 R20
/
235/50 R20
/
Key Spec
1.5
2.0 L - 2.5 L
202 BHP
151 BHP - 231 BHP
AT
Automatic & SKYACTIV® 6-speed Automatic Transaxle
Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5
2.5 L
Gasoline
Petrol
202 BHP
180 BHP
305
250
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Mage E2
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- 360 Degree Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
Mazda 6 2023 2.5L V w/ Sunroof
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Rear Defogger
- Keyless Entry
- Seats - Comfort
- Steering Adjustment
- Number of Airbags
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickMazda 6 2023 2.5L V w/ Sunroof
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Mage E2 if you care more about fuel economy; choose Mazda 6 2023 2.5L V w/ Sunroof if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Mage E2 has a fuel consumption of 6.33, while Mazda 6 2023 2.5L V w/ Sunroof has a fuel consumption of 8.2. Therefore, Mage E2 is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Mage E2 has a wheelbase of 2775, while Mazda 6 2023 2.5L V w/ Sunroof has a wheelbase of 2.830. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Mage E2, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mage E2 uses Front Drive, while Mazda 6 2023 2.5L V w/ Sunroof uses Front Wheel Drive.