Master L2H2 vs Master L4H3 Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
4
4
Dimensions
3
3
1934 kg
2420
16
16
5548
6848
2499
2808
3682
4332
3.5T
4.5T
174 mm
167
10.8m³
17m³
Fuel Economy
100
100
Interior
✓
✓
✓
✓
Driver Seat
Driver Seat
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Safety
Driver & Passenger Airbags.Passenger Airbag With Disconnecting Function.
Driver & Passenger Airbags.Passenger Airbag With Disconnecting Function.
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
Transmission
6-Speed Manual Transmission
6-Speed Manual Transmission
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Rear Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
✓
Key Spec
2.3 L - 2.3 L
2.3 L - 2.3 L
125 - 125
125 - 125
6-Speed Manual Transmission & Manual
6-Speed Manual Transmission & Manual
Diesel
Diesel
TBD
TBD
3 - 3
3 - 3
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Engine
2.3
2.3
Diesel
Diesel
125
125
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Master L2H2
- Number of Airbags
- Speed Limiter
- Spare Wheel
- EBA/BA
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
Master L4H3
- Number of Airbags
- Speed Limiter
- Spare Wheel
- EBA/BA
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickMaster L2H2
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Master L2H2 if you care more about price; choose Master L4H3 if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Master L2H2 has a fuel consumption of No data, while Master L4H3 has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Master L2H2 has a wheelbase of 3682, while Master L4H3 has a wheelbase of 4332. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Master L4H3, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Master L2H2 uses Front Drive, while Master L4H3 uses Rear Drive.