Master L4H3 vs Lite Ace 1.5L GL MT Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
4
43 L
Dimensions
3
2 Seater
2420
/
16
/
6848
4045 mm
2808
1930 mm
4332
/
4.5T
/
167
050 L
17m³
/
/
1665 mm
/
options.4,050 L
Fuel Economy
100
43 L
/
14.3 Km/L
/
14.3 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
Driver & Passenger Airbags.Passenger Airbag With Disconnecting Function.
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
Transmission
6-Speed Manual Transmission
Manual
Chassis & Steering
Rear Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
Key Spec
2.3 L - 2.3 L
1.5 L - 1.5 L
125 - 125
96 BHP - 96 BHP
6-Speed Manual Transmission & Manual
4-Speed Automatic Transmission & 5-Speed Manual Transmission & Manual
Diesel
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
3 - 3
2 - 2
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
2.3
1.5 L
Diesel
Gasoline
125
96 BHP
/
134 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
Motor
/
134 Nm
Comparison of configuration highlights
Master L4H3
- Number of Airbags
- Speed Limiter
- Spare Wheel
- EBA/BA
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
Lite Ace 1.5L GL MT
- 360 Degree camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickLite Ace 1.5L GL MT
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Master L4H3 if you care more about power; choose Lite Ace 1.5L GL MT if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Master L4H3 has a fuel consumption of No data, while Lite Ace 1.5L GL MT has a fuel consumption of 6.99. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Master L4H3 has a wheelbase of 4332, while Lite Ace 1.5L GL MT has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Master L4H3 uses Rear Drive, while Lite Ace 1.5L GL MT uses Rear Wheel Drive.