AITO 9- 5 seater vs EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
N/A, Electric
Dimensions
5
7 Seater
22"
/
5
/
5230
5209
1999
2010
1800
1731
3110
3110
Fuel Economy
/
/
65L
/
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
15.6
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
16
/
✓
/
✓
/
23
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
AT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Intelligent air suspension
/
Four-Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
Key Spec
1.5L
/
489 - 496 hp
429 BHP - 543 BHP
AT
Automatic
Electric & Hybrid
Electric
TBD
/
5
4 Seater - 7 Seater
/
TBD
/
320 km - 515 km
Exterior
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
Galaxy
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5L
0.0 L
Hybrid
Electric
496 hp
429 BHP
365Front:165/Rear:200
/
675Front:315/Rear:360
600
Motor
365Front:165/Rear:200
/
Technologies
192 Laser LiDRA + 3 Millimeter-wave radar
/
12 Ultrasonic radar + 7 High perception camera + 4 Surround view camera
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
AITO 9- 5 seater
EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Keyless Entry
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Door Edge Protector
- Active Understeer Control (AUC)
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Auto Door Lock
- Spare Wheel
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Lane Departure Warning
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose AITO 9- 5 seater if you care more about price; choose EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, AITO 9- 5 seater has a fuel consumption of No data, while EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, AITO 9- 5 seater has a wheelbase of 3110, while EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters has a wheelbase of 3110. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. AITO 9- 5 seater uses Four-Wheel Drive, while EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters uses All Wheel Drive.