Max RS vs Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
161 km/h
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
20"
/
4785
4341 mm
1930
1804 mm
1625
1693 mm
2880
2676 mm
/
414 L
Fuel Economy
56
50 L
/
17.2 Km/L
/
17.2 Km/L
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
10.2
/
Front and Back Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
/
✓
Infotainment
15.6
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
19
/
Transmission
single-speed AT
/
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
double wishbone suspension
/
multi-link suspension
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
1.5L
1.6 L
Hybrid
Gasoline
Turbocharge
/
496 hp
115 BHP
365
/
675
156 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
Key Spec
/
1.6 L - 2.0 L
/
105 BHP - 135 BHP
/
Automatic & CVT & Manual
/
Gasoline & Petrol
/
TBD
/
5 - 5
Comparison of configuration highlights
Max RS
Duster 1.6L PE (4x2)
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickDuster 1.6L PE (4x2)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Max RS if you care more about interior space; choose Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) if you care more about overall equipment.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Max RS has a fuel consumption of No data, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) has a fuel consumption of 5.81. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Max RS has a wheelbase of 2880, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) has a wheelbase of 2676 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Max RS , offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Max RS uses Four-Wheel Drive, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) uses Front Wheel Drive.