Mazda 3 Sedan Entry grade vs Ciciv SPORT Comparison

Car Information

/

9.5

/

112

/

181

Engine / Motor

/

200

Dimensions

5 Seater

5

4660

4689

1795

1801

1440

1415

444

/

/

,735

Fuel Economy

18.2

/

51

47

Comfort

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

Front Row Seats

/

Front Row Seats

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

7

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

8

8

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Transmission

Automatic

Automatic

Key Spec

2.0 L - 2.0 L

1.5 L - 2.0 L

153 BHP - 153 BHP

123 BHP - 180 BHP

6 SPEED SKYACTIV WITH SPORTS MODE & Automatic

Automatic & CVT

Gasoline

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

5 - 5

5 - 5

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.0 L

2.0

Gasoline

Gasoline

153 BHP

150

/

112

/

6400

/

181

/

5000

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Mazda 3 Sedan Entry grade

    • Number of Airbags
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • Seat belt reminder
  • Ciciv SPORT

    • Push Button Start
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Rear Cross Traffic Alert
    • Child Safety Monitoring System
    • Collision Safety Door Latch Open System
    • Collision Safety Cut-Out
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Driving Recorder
    • Security System
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • ABS
    • EBA/BA
    • Lane Departure Warning
    • Lane Keeping Assist

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • High fuel efficiency
  • Long lasting reliability
  • High quality interior design

Negative

  • Limited rear space for passengers
  • Average off road performance
  • An insufficiently innovative infotainment system

Related comparisons

Editor's PickMazda 3 Sedan Entry grade

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Mazda 3 Sedan Entry grade if you care more about price; choose Ciciv SPORT if you care more about overall equipment.

Popular Car Comparisons

Mazda | Mazda 3 Sedan Entry grade

VS

Hyundai | Hyundai Elantra 2022 2.0L Comfort

Mazda | Mazda 3 Sedan Entry grade

VS

Chevrolet | Chevrolet Malibu 2021 1.5L Turbo LS

Mazda | Mazda 3 Sedan Entry grade

VS

Bestune | B70 COM

Mazda | Mazda 3 Sedan Entry grade

VS

Hyundai | Elantra 1.6L Comfort

Mazda | Mazda 3 Sedan Entry grade

VS

Volkswagen | Volkswagen Jetta 2018 2.0 S

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Mazda 3 Sedan Entry grade has a fuel consumption of 5.49, while Ciciv SPORT has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Mazda 3 Sedan Entry grade has a wheelbase of No data, while Ciciv SPORT has a wheelbase of ,735. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mazda 3 Sedan Entry grade uses No data, while Ciciv SPORT uses No data.