Mazda 3 Sedan Entry grade vs Elantra 1.6L Comfort Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
209 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4660
4675 mm
1795
1825 mm
1440
1430 mm
444
474 L
/
2720 mm
Fuel Economy
18.2
14.9 Km/L
51
50 L
/
14.9 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Safety
7
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
8
/
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
/
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L
1.6 L - 1591 L
153 BHP
123 BHP - 159 BHP
Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline
Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
1.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
153 BHP
127 BHP
/
157 Nm
Comparison of configuration highlights
Mazda 3 Sedan Entry grade
- Number of Airbags
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- Seat belt reminder
Elantra 1.6L Comfort
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Advanced security equipment
Negative
- There is little space in the rear seats
- Sound insulation while driving is poor
- Average engine performance
Related comparisons
Editor's PickElantra 1.6L Comfort
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Mazda 3 Sedan Entry grade if you care more about fuel economy; choose Elantra 1.6L Comfort if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Mazda 3 Sedan Entry grade has a fuel consumption of 5.49, while Elantra 1.6L Comfort has a fuel consumption of 6.71. Therefore, Mazda 3 Sedan Entry grade is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Mazda 3 Sedan Entry grade has a wheelbase of No data, while Elantra 1.6L Comfort has a wheelbase of 2720 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mazda 3 Sedan Entry grade uses No data, while Elantra 1.6L Comfort uses Front Wheel Drive.