Mazda 3 Sedan Entry grade vs Seal 7 2025 Design Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
180
/
4
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
4660
4980
1795
1890
1440
1495
444
465
/
18
/
2900
Fuel Economy
18.2
16.1
51
50
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
8.8
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
7
Front Driver & Passenger Seats & Side Airbags
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
8
6
/
12.8
/
✓
/
✓
Battery/Charging
/
6.6
Transmission
Automatic
E-CVT
Chassis & Steering
/
Front Drive
/
Macpherson
/
Multi-link
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
/
✓
/
225/50 R18
/
225/50 R18
Key Spec
2.0 L - 2.0 L
1.5
153 BHP - 153 BHP
270 BHP
6 SPEED SKYACTIV WITH SPORTS MODE & Automatic
E-CVT
Gasoline
Hybrid
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5
Exterior
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
1.5
Gasoline
Hybrid
153 BHP
270 BHP
/
231
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Mazda 3 Sedan Entry grade
- Number of Airbags
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- Seat belt reminder
Seal 7 2025 Design
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree Camera
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Door Edge Protector
- Crosswind Assist
- Active Understeer Control (AUC)
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Auto Door Lock
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Lane Departure Warning
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickMazda 3 Sedan Entry grade
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Mazda 3 Sedan Entry grade if you care more about price; choose Seal 7 2025 Design if you care more about power.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Mazda 3 Sedan Entry grade has a fuel consumption of 5.49, while Seal 7 2025 Design has a fuel consumption of 6.21. Therefore, Mazda 3 Sedan Entry grade is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Mazda 3 Sedan Entry grade has a wheelbase of No data, while Seal 7 2025 Design has a wheelbase of 2900. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mazda 3 Sedan Entry grade uses No data, while Seal 7 2025 Design uses Front Drive.