Mazda 6 Entry vs 1.6 Turbo Hybrid Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
221
/
/
1,598
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
17
/
4
/
4865
5050
1840
1880
1450
1480
429
/
/
2895
/
1624
/
1631
Fuel Economy
/
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Key
/
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Cloth
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
6 Airbags (Dual front + Side front + Curtain)
10
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
8
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
4
/
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
6
/
SKYACTIV® 6-speed Automatic Transaxle
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
/
/
MacPherson Strut / Multi-Link Suspension
/
MacPherson Strut / Multi-Link Suspension
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Key Spec
2.0 L - 2.5 L
1.6 L - 3.5 L
151 BHP - 231 BHP
177 BHP - 300 BHP
6 Sp SkyActiv with Sports Mode & Automatic
Automatic & Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Hybrid & Petrol & Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5 Seater - 5 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.5 L
1.6
Gasoline
Hybrid
190 BHP
177
252
264
91
/
/
47.7
/
177
/
4500
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Sport
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Motor
/
47.7 kW
Comparison of configuration highlights
Mazda 6 Entry
- Push Button Start
- Parking sensor rear
- Keyless Start
- Remote key types
- Number of Airbags
- Seat belt reminder
1.6 Turbo Hybrid
- Power Tailgate
- Welcome Light
- Number of Airbags
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Active Safety Warning System
- Lane Keeping Assist
Review Comparison
Positive
- Stylish and modern exterior design
- High internal manufacturing quality
- Great driving and control fun
Negative
- The back space may be tight
- The suspension system can be harsh on off road
- The interface of some technologies needs improvements
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Mazda 6 Entry if you care more about price; choose 1.6 Turbo Hybrid if you care more about power.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Mazda 6 Entry has a fuel consumption of No data, while 1.6 Turbo Hybrid has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Mazda 6 Entry has a wheelbase of No data, while 1.6 Turbo Hybrid has a wheelbase of 2895. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mazda 6 Entry uses Front Drive, while 1.6 Turbo Hybrid uses No data.