Mazda 6 Entry vs Ciciv SPORT Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
221
200
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
17
/
4
/
4865
4689
1840
1801
1450
1415
429
/
/
,735
Fuel Economy
/
47
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
Smart Key
/
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Cloth
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
6 Airbags (Dual front + Side front + Curtain)
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
8
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
4
8
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
6
/
SKYACTIV® 6-speed Automatic Transaxle
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
/
Key Spec
2.0 L - 2.5 L
1.5 L - 2.0 L
151 BHP - 231 BHP
123 BHP - 198 BHP
Automatic & SKYACTIV® 6-speed Automatic Transaxle
Automatic & CVT & Manual
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.5 L
2.0
Gasoline
Gasoline
190 BHP
150
252
181
91
/
/
112
/
6400
/
5000
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Sport
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Mazda 6 Entry
- Push Button Start
- Parking sensor rear
- Keyless Start
- Remote key types
- Number of Airbags
- Seat belt reminder
Ciciv SPORT
- Push Button Start
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Cross Traffic Alert
- Child Safety Monitoring System
- Collision Safety Door Latch Open System
- Collision Safety Cut-Out
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Driving Recorder
- Security System
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- ABS
- EBA/BA
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
Review Comparison
Positive
- Stylish and modern exterior design
- High internal manufacturing quality
- Great driving and control fun
Negative
- The back space may be tight
- The suspension system can be harsh on off road
- The interface of some technologies needs improvements
Positive
- High fuel efficiency
- Long lasting reliability
- High quality interior design
Negative
- Limited rear space for passengers
- Average off road performance
- An insufficiently innovative infotainment system
Related comparisons
Editor's PickMazda 6 Entry
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Mazda 6 Entry if you care more about price; choose Ciciv SPORT if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Mazda 6 Entry has a fuel consumption of No data, while Ciciv SPORT has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Mazda 6 Entry has a wheelbase of No data, while Ciciv SPORT has a wheelbase of ,735. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mazda 6 Entry uses Front Drive, while Ciciv SPORT uses No data.