Mazda 6 Entry vs Mage E1 Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
221
190
/
4
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
17
19
4
/
4865
4650
1840
1905
1450
1630
429
/
/
1480
/
2775
Fuel Economy
/
15.8
/
51
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Key
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Cloth
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
10.25
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
6 Airbags (Dual front + Side front + Curtain)
4
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
8
13.2
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
4
6
/
✓
Transmission
6
/
SKYACTIV® 6-speed Automatic Transaxle
AT
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Drive
Wheels/brakes
/
235/55 R19
/
235/55 R19
Key Spec
2.0 L - 2.5 L
1.5
151 BHP - 231 BHP
202 BHP
6 Sp SkyActiv with Sports Mode & Automatic
7AT & AT
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.5 L
1.5
Gasoline
Gasoline
190 BHP
202 BHP
252
305
91
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Sport
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Mazda 6 Entry
- Push Button Start
- Parking sensor rear
- Keyless Start
- Remote key types
- Number of Airbags
- Seat belt reminder
Mage E1
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- 360 Degree Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
Review Comparison
Positive
- Stylish and modern exterior design
- High internal manufacturing quality
- Great driving and control fun
Negative
- The back space may be tight
- The suspension system can be harsh on off road
- The interface of some technologies needs improvements
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickMazda 6 Entry
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Mazda 6 Entry if you care more about price; choose Mage E1 if you care more about power.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Mazda 6 Entry has a fuel consumption of No data, while Mage E1 has a fuel consumption of 6.33. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Mazda 6 Entry has a wheelbase of No data, while Mage E1 has a wheelbase of 2775. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mazda 6 Entry uses Front Drive, while Mage E1 uses Front Drive.