Mazda 6 Entry vs Pegas 1.4L M/T Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
221
170 km/h
/
4
/
1368 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
17
/
4
4 Doors
4865
4300 mm
1840
1700 mm
1450
1460 mm
429
475 L
/
2570 mm
/
150 mm
Fuel Economy
/
13
/
43 L
/
13 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Smart Key
Keyless Entry
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Cloth
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
Digital
/
Single
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Manual
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
6 Airbags (Dual front + Side front + Curtain)
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
8
8
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Android LCD
✓
/
✓
/
4
6
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
6
/
SKYACTIV® 6-speed Automatic Transaxle
Manual
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L - 2.5 L
1.4 L - 1.4 L
151 BHP - 231 BHP
93 BHP - 95
6 Sp SkyActiv with Sports Mode & Automatic
3 Speed AT & Automatic & Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
LED
LED
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.5 L
1.4 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
190 BHP
95 BHP
252
133 Nm
91
/
/
In-Line
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Sport
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Mazda 6 Entry
- Push Button Start
- Parking sensor rear
- Keyless Start
- Remote key types
- Number of Airbags
- Seat belt reminder
Pegas 1.4L M/T
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- Stylish and modern exterior design
- High internal manufacturing quality
- Great driving and control fun
Negative
- The back space may be tight
- The suspension system can be harsh on off road
- The interface of some technologies needs improvements
Positive
- Economical in fuel consumption
- Comfortable interior space in comparison with competitors
- Good value for the price
Negative
- Average performance on highways
- The quality of the cabin materials is less competitive
- Lack of advanced driving techniques
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Mazda 6 Entry if you care more about power; choose Pegas 1.4L M/T if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Mazda 6 Entry has a fuel consumption of No data, while Pegas 1.4L M/T has a fuel consumption of 7.69. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Mazda 6 Entry has a wheelbase of No data, while Pegas 1.4L M/T has a wheelbase of 2570 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mazda 6 Entry uses Front Drive, while Pegas 1.4L M/T uses Front Drive.