Mazda CX 3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD) vs All-New Duster PE 1.6L 4×2 CVT Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
190
/
4
4
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
4275
4341
1765
2052
1535
1693
2570
/
240
478
/
1235
/
1785
/
5.07
/
491
Fuel Economy
15.4
/
48
50
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Rear
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
Front Driver & Passenger Airbags.Passenger Airbag With Disconnecting Function.
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Front
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
CVT
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
/
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
/
Drum
/
215/65 R16
/
215/65 R16
Key Spec
2.0 L - 2.0 L
1.6 L - 2.0 L
145 BHP - 148 BHP
105 BHP - 135 BHP
6 Speed SkyActiv with Sports Mode & Automatic
Automatic & CVT & Manual
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
1.6
Gasoline
Gasoline
148 BHP
115
192
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Mazda CX 3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD)
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
All-New Duster PE 1.6L 4×2 CVT
- Number of Airbags
- Speed Limiter
- Spare Wheel
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- ABS
- EBA/BA
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Seat belt reminder
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Mazda CX 3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD) if you care more about power; choose All-New Duster PE 1.6L 4×2 CVT if you care more about overall equipment.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Mazda CX 3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD) has a fuel consumption of 6.49, while All-New Duster PE 1.6L 4×2 CVT has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Mazda CX 3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD) has a wheelbase of 2570, while All-New Duster PE 1.6L 4×2 CVT has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mazda CX 3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD) uses Front Wheel Drive, while All-New Duster PE 1.6L 4×2 CVT uses No data.