Mazda CX 3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD) vs Avatr 11 2024 Avatr 11 2024 AWD Comparison

Car Information

8.3

4.5

Engine / Motor

190

200

4

N/A, Electric

Dimensions

5 Seater

5 Seater

4275

4.880

1765

1.970

1535

1.601

2570

2.975

240

489

Fuel Economy

15.4

/

48

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

680

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Transmission

Automatic

/

Chassis & Steering

Front Wheel Drive

All Wheel Drive

/

/

Key Spec

2.0 L - 2.0 L

/

145 BHP - 148 BHP

570 - 599 BHP

6 Speed SkyActiv with Sports Mode & Automatic

AT

Gasoline & Petrol

Electric

TBD

/

5 - 5

5 - 5

/

TBD

/

650 km

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.0 L

0.0 L

Gasoline

Electric

148 BHP

570 BHP

192

650

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

Motor

/

Double

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Mazda CX 3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD)

    • Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Rear Defogger
    • Temperature Display
    • Keyless Entry
    • Welcome Light
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Active braking
  • Avatr 11 2024 Avatr 11 2024 AWD

    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Collision Detection

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickAvatr 11 2024 Avatr 11 2024 AWD

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Mazda CX 3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD) if you care more about interior space; choose Avatr 11 2024 Avatr 11 2024 AWD if you care more about power.

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Mazda CX 3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD) has a fuel consumption of 6.49, while Avatr 11 2024 Avatr 11 2024 AWD has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Mazda CX 3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD) has a wheelbase of 2570, while Avatr 11 2024 Avatr 11 2024 AWD has a wheelbase of 2.975. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Mazda CX 3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD), offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mazda CX 3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD) uses Front Wheel Drive, while Avatr 11 2024 Avatr 11 2024 AWD uses All Wheel Drive.