Mazda CX 3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD) vs Chevrolet Blazer 2023 3.6L V6 RS (FWD) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
190
/
4
6
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4275
4862
1765
1948
1535
1702
2570
2863
240
/
Fuel Economy
15.4
7.3
48
/
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
/
✓
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Key Spec
2.0 L - 2000 L
2.5 L - 3.6 L
148 BHP
193 BHP - 305 BHP
Automatic
Automatic
Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
3.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
148 BHP
305 BHP
192
366
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Mazda CX 3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD)
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Chevrolet Blazer 2023 3.6L V6 RS (FWD)
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Steering Adjustment
- Runflat Tyres
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickChevrolet Blazer 2023 3.6L V6 RS (FWD)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Mazda CX 3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD) if you care more about fuel economy; choose Chevrolet Blazer 2023 3.6L V6 RS (FWD) if you care more about interior space.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Mazda CX 3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD) has a fuel consumption of 6.49, while Chevrolet Blazer 2023 3.6L V6 RS (FWD) has a fuel consumption of 13.7. Therefore, Mazda CX 3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Mazda CX 3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD) has a wheelbase of 2570, while Chevrolet Blazer 2023 3.6L V6 RS (FWD) has a wheelbase of 2863. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Chevrolet Blazer 2023 3.6L V6 RS (FWD), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mazda CX 3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD) uses Front Wheel Drive, while Chevrolet Blazer 2023 3.6L V6 RS (FWD) uses Front Wheel Drive.