Mazda CX 3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD) vs CS75 PLUS SPORT Comparison

Car Information

8.3

/

Engine / Motor

190

/

4

/

Dimensions

5 Seater

5

4275

4700

1765

1865

1535

1710

2570

2710

240

/

Fuel Economy

15.4

/

48

58

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Key

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Front Row Seats

/

12

/

Front Row Seats

/

LCD

/

Driver Seat

/

Leather

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

6

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

12

/

/

8

/

SONY

Transmission

Automatic

8-Speed Automatic

/

8

Chassis & Steering

Front Wheel Drive

Front Drive

Wheels/brakes

/

225/55 R19

/

225/55 R19

Key Spec

2.0 L - 2000 L

2.0 L

145 BHP - 148 BHP

229 BHP - 233 BHP

Automatic

8-Speed Automatic

Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline

TBD

TBD

5 Seater

5

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

Engine

2.0 L

2.0 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

148 BHP

233 BHP

192

390

/

2.0T GDI

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Normal, Economy

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Mazda CX 3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD)

    • Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Rear Defogger
    • Temperature Display
    • Keyless Entry
    • Welcome Light
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Active braking
  • CS75 PLUS SPORT

    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Cool Box
    • Push Button Start
    • Keyless Entry
    • Welcome Light
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Keyless Start
    • Remote key types
    • Rear Cross Traffic Alert
    • Number of Airbags
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
    • Lane Departure Warning
    • Lane Keeping Assist

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickMazda CX 3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD)

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Mazda CX 3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD) if you care more about price; choose CS75 PLUS SPORT if you care more about interior space.

Popular Car Comparisons

Mazda | Mazda CX 3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD)

VS

Kia | Sonet 1.5L EX1

Mazda | Mazda CX 3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD)

VS

Hyundai | Hyundai Venue 2024 1.6L Limited

Mazda | Mazda CX 3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD)

VS

Changan | Changan CS75 2021 1.8T GDI Basic (AWD)

Mazda | Mazda CX 3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD)

VS

Changan | Changan CS75 2021 1.8T GDI Full Option (AWD)

Mazda | Mazda CX 3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD)

VS

Hyundai | Hyundai Tucson 2018 2.0L Base (FWD)

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Mazda CX 3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD) has a fuel consumption of 6.49, while CS75 PLUS SPORT has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Mazda CX 3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD) has a wheelbase of 2570, while CS75 PLUS SPORT has a wheelbase of 2710. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, CS75 PLUS SPORT, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mazda CX 3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD) uses Front Wheel Drive, while CS75 PLUS SPORT uses Front Drive.